Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50942 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2017 Thana -GANGTA District- MUNGER ====================================================== Chhotu Kumar, son of Sudhir Kumar Singh, resident of village/Mohalla Milki, P.S. Gangta, Distt. Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjiv Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Gangta P.S. Case No. 22 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that there is specific allegation against co-accused Manish Kumar. Mere suspicion has been raised against this petitioner that he helped Manish Kumar in kidnapping sister of the informant.

There is specific allegation against co-accused Manish Kumar that he has kidnapped the sister of the informant. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Gangta P.S. Case No. 22 of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50942 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 2/2 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T