Pratibha Singh @ Pratibha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9062 of 2026 ====================================================== Pratibha Singh @ Pratibha Kumari Wife of Vishawjit Kumar, Resident of village- Musafir Ganj, Railway Colony, P.S.- Buxar Tow, District- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Through its Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Bihar.

2.

The District Magistrate, Buxar.

3.

The ADM, Buxar.

4.

The DCLR, Dumraon, Buxar.

5.

The Circle Officer, Dumraon, Buxar.

6.

Pawan Kumar Tiwari, Son of Late Jagdish Tiwari, Resident of Tiwari Tola, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar.

7.

Rajesh Kumar, Son of Ram Jatan Singh, Resident of Dumraon, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar.

8.

Ashok Kumar Tiwari @ Ashok Kumar Tripathy, Son of Late Bhola Nath Tiwari, Resident of Dumraon, P.S.- Dumraon, District- Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ambrish Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Government Pleader (02) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANA VIKRAM SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-07-2026 This case has been listed under the heading 'For Orders (On Office Notes)' in view of the defect(s) pointed out by the stamp report.

2. When the case was called out, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ application with liberty to approach the appropriate forum i.e., Bihar Land Tribunal, which is functional now as he has an alternative efficacious remedy by filing an

Patna High Court CWJC No.9062 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026 2/2 appeal before the Bihar Land Tribunal under the provisions of the Bihar Land Tribunal Act, 2009.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State also supports the contention of the petitioner and submits that he has an efficacious alternative remedy before the Bihar Land Tribunal.

4. In view of the prayer so made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed off with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application before the appropriate forum in terms of the appropriate provisions of law.

5. It goes without saying that if any question of limitation arises before the competent authority, the same shall be considered taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the issue before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

10. All pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand/s disposed off.

(Rana Vikram Singh, J) smriti/Prakash U