Patna High CourtCWJC/483/2016disposed

Aliya Shamsi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-10-11Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.483 of 2016 ====================================================== Aliya Shamsi Wife of Late Mahmood Alam Mohnavi (Retired Sessions Judge, Rohtas), Resident of Mohalla- Khankah, P.S.- Biharsharif, DistrictNalanda, At present resident of Mohalla- Dariyapur, P.S.- Peerbahore, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Principal Secretary, Department of Personal and Administrative Reform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. Secretary Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar

4. Accountant General (A & E), Bihar, Patna

5. Treasury Officer, Nalanda Bihar

6. Senior Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Magna Market, Biharsharif, District- Nalanda

7. Department of Legal Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

8. The High of Judicature at Patna through Registrar General, Patna High Court .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ishtiyaque Ahmad, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, AC to AAG-15 For the A.G. : Mr. Bindhyachal Rai, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General.

It is agreed by the parties that during the pendency of the writ application the entire post retiral dues have been paid. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the calculation or payment of any of the post retrial dues, she shall be at liberty to raise such grievance by way of filing a representation within a period of one month from today and if such representation is made

Patna High Court CWJC No.483 of 2016 (5) dt.11-10-2017 with regard to wrong calculation or non-payment of any of the retrial dues to which the petitioner is found entitled, the respondents shall be under obligation to see that the grievance of the petitioner raised in such representation is addressed within a period of two months.

With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Surendra/- U