Sahid Khan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25573 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-668 Year-2017 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== SAHID KHAN Son of Irsad Khan, Resident of Vill- Baradih, P.S.- Agrer, Dist.- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent, bears no criminal antecedent and not named in the F.I.R. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner and co-accused has already been granted the privilege of bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 4th

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25573 of 2019(4) dt.27-06-2019 2/2 Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with S.Tr. No. 386 of 2018 arising out of Sasaram (Model) Police Station Case No. 668 of 2017, subject to the conditions: (I) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(II) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below. (III) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T