Chandrama Thakur v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.55080 of 2015 Arising Out of Complaint Case No.2376(C), Year- 2012 , District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Chandrama Thakur, son of late Shambhu Thakur, R/o Chamtha Barkhunt, P.S. - Bachhwara, District - Begusarai.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Harinandan Rai, son of late Lakhan Rai, r/o village - Chamtha Barkhunt, P.S. - Wachhawara, District - Begusarai.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For the State : Dr. Rabindra Kumar, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 08-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 420, 468 and 471/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering that the Petitioner claims bona fide land dispute and has fair antecedents, let the Petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Complaint Case No. 2376(C) of 2012, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Sri R.K. Dwivedi,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55080 of 2015 (2) dt.08-12-2015 2/2 Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai, or his successor, subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T