Mithun Mahton v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28713 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-640 Year-2023 Thana- BARAUNI District- Begusarai ====================================================== Mithun Mahton Son of Raj Kumar Mahato Resident of Village- Ibrahimpur Tola, Ward No. 28, P.S.- Barauni, Dist.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sourendra Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-04-2024
1) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2) The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of one case and allegation is of recovery of 8.250 liters of liquor from an Auto.
4) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized Auto. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and thus would create
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28713 of 2024(2) dt.16-04-2024 2/2 evidence against himself and hence would get implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that the driver of the vehicle would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged.
5) Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6) Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Barauni (Refinery O.P.) P.S. Case No. 640 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
7) However, it is made clear the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T