← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6081/2006dismissed

Kishori Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-01-18Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6081 of 2006 ======================================================

1. Kishori Singh

2. Amrendra Kumar Singh, both sons of Late Chandradeo Singh, resident of Village Manjurahi, P.S. Aurangabad Muffasil, District Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Additional Member Board of Revenue, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Collector, Aurangabad.

4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Aurangabad.

5. Vijay Kumar Singh son of Late Shiv Nandan Singh

6. Amit Kumar Singh son of Vijay Kumar Singh

7. Pranti Devi w/o Vijay Kumar Singh

8. Sumit Kumar Singh son of Vijay Kumar Singh, all residents of village Manjurahi, P.S. Aurangabad Muffasil, District Aurangabad.

9. Ram Pravesh Singh s/o Late Pandit Singh, resident of village Bharkuria, P.S.-Dehri-on-Sone, District Rohtas, At present resident of village Manjurahi, P.S. Aurangabad Muffasil, District Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Shankar Kr. Thakur, AC to GP 27 For respondent no.6 : Mr. G.N. Ojha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2020 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.

The petitioners filed this writ petition for quashing the order dated 30.08.2005 passed by learned Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar in Revision Case No.282 of 2004 by which the learned Additional Member confirmed the order dated 20.10.2004 passed by Additional Collector (respondent no.3) passed in Mutation Appeal No.142 of 2004-05 and order dated 06.08.2004 passed by D.C.L.R. in Ceiling Case No.38 of 2002-

Patna High Court CWJC No.6081 of 2006(10) dt.18-01-2020 2/2 03 by which the application of the petitioners for pre-emption has been rejected.

Now right of pre-emption has already been abolished by amending Act (06 of 2019) by which Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act has been repealed.

Having considered the facts, I do not find any merit in this writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U