← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25295/2026bail granted

Ramashish Prasad @ Ramashish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-06-17Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25295 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-163 Year-2025 Thana- MESKAUR District- Nawada ====================================================== Ramashish Prasad @ Ramashish Kumar S/o Lalkeshwar Prasad Resident of Village - Pathara, P.S. - Meskaur, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheonandan Pandit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, APP For the State :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Meskaur P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(1), 74, 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has alleged that the named accused persons in the FIR including the petitioner, on account of land dispute, started assaulting the informant and others. The petitioner is alleged to have assaulted one Babulal with iron rod causing head injury.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated on account of a land

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25295 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 2/3 dispute. It has further been submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would be evident that each and every family member has been singled out and attributed with precise allegation of assault on one or the other person, which is only to implicate all. It has further been submitted that though the injury sustained by Babulal is said to be grievous in nature, however, from the Xray report, it would appear that the fracture was seen of bilateral nasal bone with soft tissue swelling. It has further been submitted that there was a counter case for the said incident and both sides had received injuries and the injury report of some of the persons has been brought on record by way of AnnexureP/4. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioner carries clean antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has assaulted on the head of Babulal Yadav which caused grievous injuries to him.

6. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25295 of 2026(3) dt.17-06-2026 3/3 Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate- 4th Nawada in connection with Meskaur P.S. Case No. 163 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 of the BNSS and subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner and the other shall be a local resident:

(ii) the petitioner will remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the learned Trial Court and shall cooperate in the investigation;

(iii) in case of absence on two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled by the Court concerned;

(iv) the Court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of the same on in the name of verification.

(v) If the petitioner, in future, is found to be involved in similar nature of offence, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of his/her bail bonds.

7. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial. (Sourendra Pandey, J) Tannu/- U T