Patna High CourtL.P.A/2242/2015dismissed

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-03Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2242 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1531 of 2013 =========================================================== Rakesh Kumar, son of Late Niarbhay Kumar, resident of village- - Aiyara, P.S. - Karpi, District - Arwal .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

2. The Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna

3. The District Magistrate, Jehanabad

4. The District Education Officer, Jehanabad

5. The Block Education Officer, Ratni, Faridpur Block, District - Jehanabad

6. The School Inspector (Primary Education), Kurtha Block, Kurtha, District - Jehanabad

7. The Headmaster / In-charge Headmaster, Prathmik Vidyalaya Khairuchak, District - Jehanabad .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Navin Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. GP26- N.K. SINGH =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 03-02-2017 The grounds stated in paragraph 3 and 4 of the I. A. No. 9747 of 2015 for a delay of one year and nine months, are not valid reasons, on which condonation can be granted. The said interlocutory application is dismissed. As a consequent thereof, even the appeal is dismissed.

The Court has gone through the impugned order, passed in the writ application, namely, C. W. J. C. No. 1531 of 2013, dated 21.02.2014. A reading of the said order does not

Patna High Court LPA No.2242 of 2015 dt.03-02-2017 2/2 indicate that the Learned Single Judge has committed any error of law or fact, which requires to be interfered with. The appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 03.02.2017 Transmission Date