Dharmendra Paswan @ Dharmendra Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3735 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -241 Year- 2017 Thana -ROHTAS District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Dharmendra Paswan @ Dharmendra Ram S/o Sakaldeep Paswan @ Sakaldeep Ram.

2. Sakaldeep Paswan @ Sakaldeep Ram, S/o Late Makun Paswan, All resident of Village- Samhuta, P.S.+ District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Bhagat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-02-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307/34 of the IPC.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assaulting the informant and his wife by means of lathi and danda. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that only general and omnibus allegation of assault by lathi and danda has been levelled against the petitioners and further all the injuries caused to the informant was found to be simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedents.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3735 of 2018 (2) dt.01-02-2018 2/2 surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Dehri-on-Sone, Sasaram, in connection with Rohtas P.S. Case No. 241 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T