← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4821/2014disposed

Dwarika Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-02-18Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4821 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Dwarika Sah, Son Of Late Bhola Sah, Resident Of Village- Harpur Bazar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

2. Tarkeshwar Prasad Srivastava, Son Of Late Bageshwari Prasad, Resident Of Village- Bolahata, P.S.- Uchakagaon, District- Gopalganj

3. Prayag Manjhi, Son Of Late Sudama Manjhi, Resident Of Village- Balbhadra Parsha, District- Gopalganj

4. Shyam Lal Sah, Son Of Late Chathu Sah, Resident Of Village- Harpur Bazar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

5. Ram Ayodhya Sah, Son Of Amika Sah, Resident Of Village- Balbhadra Parsha, P.S.- Phulwariya, District- Gopalganj

6. Jai Kishun Sah, Son Of Late Raj Mohan Sah, Resident Of Village- Harpur Bazar, P.S.- Uchkagaon, District- Gopalganj

7. Shiv Pujan Prasad, Son Of Late Jugeshwar Prasad, Resident Of VillageShampur, P.S.- Uchakagaon, District- Gopalganj

8. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Son Of Birendra Singh, Resident Of Village- Uchakagaon, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. The Collector, Gopalganj

3. The B.D.O., Gopalganj

4. The Civil Surgeon, Gopalganj

5. The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre Uchakagaon, DistrictGopalganj .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Rajeev For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumari Amrita =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-02-2016 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

If application is filed by the petitioners before the District Magistrate, Gopalganj, the claim of these petitioners will be examined and an appropriate decision will be taken within a reasonable time-frame. The Court expresses no opinion on the merit

Patna High Court CWJC No.4821 of 2014 dt.18-02-2016 2/2 of the claim of the petitioners.

Intervention application is rejected, as these applicants have their own right to assert, independent of the present writ application.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U