Anita Kumari @ Anita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6744 of 2024 ====================================================== Anita Kumari @ Anita Devi wife of Bhola Paswan, resident of villageSangrampur, Gram Panchayat- Bikrampur, Bande, Ward No.- 5, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director I.C.D.S. Patna.

3.

The Collector, Samastipur.

4.

The District Program Officer, Samastipur, 5.

The Child Development Officer, Samastipur Gramin, District- Samastipur 6.

The lady Supervisor, Samastipur Gramin.

7.

Sabita Kumari, w/o Sunil Kumar Das, resident of village- Sangrampur, Gram Panchayat- Bikrampur Bande, Ward No.-4, P.S.- Muffasil, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadav, GP-23 Ms. Meera Singh, Ac to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "1(i). For issuance of an appropriate Writ in the nature of CERTIORARI to quash the order dated 29.01.2024 (Annexure -13) passed in Anganbari Appeal No. 103/ 02021filed by the Respondent No.7 against the order dated 24.12.2020 passed by the Respondent No. 4, whereby and whereunder he has remanded back to the matter to him, to make selection afresh within a month, in his presence, after quashing the order dated

Patna High Court CWJC No.6744 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 24.12.2020 (Annexure-12) passed by the Respondent No.4.

(ii). For issuance of appropriate Writ in the nature of MANDAMUS to command the Respondent authority not to proceed against the Guideline / rule and regulation, issued by the Government of Bihar (Respondent No. 1)."

2.

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law including that of filing a suit before the learned Civil Court having competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted. 3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U