Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1019/2013dismissed

Ram Narayan Mistri v. The State Of Bihar Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS.

2015-01-06Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1019 of 2013 ====================================================== Ram Narayan Mistri son of Late Jawahar Mistri, resident of villageChiraiyatar, Postal Park, Road No.- 3, P.S. - Jakkanpur, Distt. - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director-in-Chief Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Duputy T.B.D.C. Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

4. The Deputy Director Health Services, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Commissioner and Secretary Health Medical Education and Family Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The Additional Director Health Services, Bihar-cum-Controlling Officer, T.B. Control Scheme, Bihar Agam Kuan, Patna. - 7.

7. The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medial Officer, Jehanabad.

8. The Joint Director Health Services Bihar, Patna.

9. The Superintendent Sub-Divisional Hospital, Danapur, Bihar, Patna.

10. The Superintendent, Patna Medical College and Hospital (P.M.C.H), Patna.

11. The Officer-in-Charge of Sachivalaya Police Station, Patna.

12. The Senior S.P. Patna.

13. The D.G.P. Bihar Patna.

14. Ramautar Prasad, B.C.G., Technician-cum-Typist, P.M.C.H., Patna.

15. Ratindra Prasad, Lab Technician, Sub-Divisional Hospital, Danapur,

16. The Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Madhuresh Prasad, G.P.-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The prayer of the petitioner in paragraph-1 of the writ petition is as under:- "1. That this writ application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for issuance of the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1019 of 2013 (2) dt.06-01-2015 2/2 writ in the nature of Mandamus or some other appropriate writ commanding/directing the respondents not to harass the petitioner."

The writ petition is thoroughly misconceived. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T