← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1092/2023disposed

Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-20Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri,Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1092 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12791 of 2022 ====================================================== Mantosh Kumar @ Mantosh Kumar Yadav Son of Bhola Yadav, Resident of Village-Dakhram, P.s.-Bahera, District-Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar.

2.

Sri Amrit Laal Meena, The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Bihar, Patna. 3.

Sri Radhey Shyam Sah, the Divisional Commissioner, Darhanga Division, Patna.

4.

Rajeev Raushan, the Collector, Darbhanga.

5.

Sri Sambhu Nath Jha, the S.D.O. Benipur Sub Division, Darbhanga. 6.

Sri Samarjeet, the B.D.O. Benipur Circle, Benipur, Darbhanga. 7.

Sri Uday Chandra Akela, the Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Benipur, Darbhanga.

8.

Sri Amarnath Jha, the Ward Councillor, Ward No. 11, Benipur Nagar Parishad, Benipur, Darbhanga.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Ajay (GA 5) For O.P. No. 7 :

Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) Date : 20-04-2024 The present M.J.C. is filed for non compliance of order dated 02.09.2022 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 12791 of 2022. The same has been complied to that effect and order has been passed on 28.03.2024 in so far as installation of GPRS light, Nal-Jal and PCC Road. These things were stated to have been

Patna High Court MJC No.1092 of 2023 dt.20-04-2024 2/2 installed in Ward No. 11. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner is disputing to the extent that on both the ways GPRS light have not been installed.

2. On the other hand, we have perused his representation. In the representation, he has not pleaded that lights were required to be installed on both the ways, and therefore, there is compliance to the Orders of this Court. That apart, providing infrastructure are policy matters.

3. Accordingly, the present M.J.C. No. 1092 of 2023 / contempt petition stands dropped, reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the concerned authority in respect of any other issue.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 23.04.2024.

Transmission Date N/A