Patna High CourtCWJC/6576/2014dismissed

Alakh Niranjan Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-15Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6576 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Alakh Niranjan Prasad S/O Late Shidheshwar Prasad R/O - Village - Jamsari, P.S. Bind, P.O. Jamsari, District - Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Bihar, Patna

3. The Additional Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Bihar, Patna

4. The Joint Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Bihar, Patna

5. The Engineer - In - Chief, Department Of Water Resources, Bihar, Patna

6. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Daltenganj Palamu, Jharkhand

7. The Superintending Engineer, Water Resources Department, North Koel Dam, Construction, Circle, Palamu, Jharkhand

8. The Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources Development Samastipur

9. The Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources Development, Darbhanga

10. The Superintending Engineer, Department Of Water Resources Development West Kosi Canal Division 1, Rajiv Sivi Jai Nagar, Darbhanga

11. The Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Department Of Water Resources Development West Kosi Canal Division 1, Rajiv Sivi Jai Nagar, Darbhanga

12. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Manoj For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, SC 19 Mr Neeraj Raj, AC to SC 19 Mr Bindhyachal Rai =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-03-2016 This writ application is dismissed as the petitioner has been given the requisite promotions all along which emerges from Annexure- 7, the speaking order passed by the Chief engineer dated 17.12.2009.

It is a case of greed and nothing else which is reflected from the present proceeding by a retired employee, who

Patna High Court CWJC No.6576 of 2014 dt.15-03-2016 2/2 superannuated in the year 2003, at the evening of his life for a few silver more. The rational and reasoning provided for rejection are cogent and valid and does not require any interference. Writ is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U