← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38408/2016disposed

Jaidev Narayan Sinha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-11-25Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38408 of 2016 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2016 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBegusarai ====================================================== Jaidev Narayan Sinha, son of Late Kapildeo Narayan, resident of VillageKamla, P.S.- Cheria Bariarpur, District- Begusarai, At present- MohallaAshok Nagar, Pokharia, Begusarai, P.S.- Town, District- Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Superintendent of Police, Begusarai.

3.

The Station House Officer, Muffasil, Police Station Begusarai, DistrictBegusarai. 4.

Dr. Sri Hari Narayan Singh, The Civil Surgeon-cum- Chief Medical Officer, Begusarai.

5.

Dr.Ram Rekha, son of Late Mathura Singh, Resident of Village PostRampur, Dumra, P.S.- Maranchi, District- Patna, At present In-Charge Medical Officer, Sadar Block, Begusarai.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Indu Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-11-2020 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

The State is represented by Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha.

This is an application seeking quashing of the F.I.R. bearing Begusarai Muffasil P. S. Case No. 291 of 2016 dated 22.07.2016, instituted for the offence under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38408 of 2016(3) dt.25-11-2020 2/2 Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

This Court had called for a report from the court below about the stage of the case.

It appears that final form has been submitted and the case is pending for acceptance on the final form. In that view of the matter, no interference by this Court is required.

This petition is disposed off.

In case the final form is not accepted, the petitioner would have the liberty to challenge the order passed on such report.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) skm/- U T