← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./34649/2021bail granted

Mantosh Kumar Yadav @ Mantosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-01Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34649 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2019 Thana- SONBERSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== MANTOSH KUMAR YADAV @ MANTOSH KUMAR Son of Phuleshwar Yadav Resident of Village - Shahpur, Balu Tola, P.S.- Sonbarsa Raj, District - Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 01-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the prosecution case, on hearing the sound of firing, on the informant waking up, it is stated that he saw the petitioner, his wife, father-in-law and brother-in-law fleeing away.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the earlier application for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 23.6.2020 (Annexure-1) passed in Cr. Misc. no.3092 of 2020 directing the learned trial Court to conclude the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34649 of 2021(4) dt.01-02-2022 2/3 trial within eight months and giving liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail if the trial is not concluded within eight months. It is stated that more than 1 year and 6 months having passed since passing of the said order, there is no progress in the learned trial Court and not a single witness has been examined on behalf of the prosecution. The petitioner is in custody since 13.11.2019 and undertakes to cooperate in the trial. He has no criminal antecedent Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.

A report was called for from the learned trial Court. As per the report received contained in letter dated 13.1.2022 of the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Saharsa, the case is pending for appearance of the accused persons.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts of the case, the liberty granted to the petitioner in the aforesaid order dated 23.6.2020 together with the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent and having remained in custody for over 2 years and the stage of trial in the learned trial Court, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with Sonbersa P.S. Case no. 19 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34649 of 2021(4) dt.01-02-2022 3/3 Magistrate 1st Class, Saharsa.

It is directed that the petitioner shall cooperate in the trial in the learned trial Court and shall remain physically present in Court on each date of the trial. In case, the learned trial Court is of the opinion that the trial is being delayed due to noncooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into custody till conclusion of the trial.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash/- U