Amit Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar @ Chotu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31478 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391 Year-2022 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== AMIT KUMAR @ CHHOTU KUMAR @ CHOTU SON OF RABINDRA MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- UTTIMPUR, P.S.- KHUSRUPUR, DISTRICTPATNA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

PRADIP KUMAR SON OF KRISHNA PRASAD R/O MOHALLA- MIAN TOLI NEAR PARK P.O. AND P.S.- KHUSRUPUR, WARD NO.5, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State, Dr. Indiwar Kumari.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 379, 341, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The informant alleges that accused persons came and abused him, further, earlier a case has been instituted against the petitioner with an allegation that he misbehaved with his daughter, further, on the date of occurrence petitioner took Rs. 15,000/- along with documents of the land.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with one antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31478 of 2023(2) dt.31-07-2023 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that the dispute is going on in between the petitioner and the informant on account of which he is being implicated in false cases, it is also submitted that all Sections are bailable except Section 379 and the same in the nature of allegation is not made out.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 391 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) HarshPandey/- U T