Rambrikash Rajvanshi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26207 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Rambrikash Rajvanshi S/o Lakhan Rajvanshi Resident of village - Khanpur P.S - Hisua, District - Nawada 2.

Rubi Devi W/o Chunni Rajvanshi Resident of village - Khanpur P.S - Hisua, District - Nawada.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pushpa Sinha No.1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-04-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.86 of 2026 instituted under Sections 30(a), 30(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act..

3. As per the prosecution case, on getting secret information that some persons are manufacturing the country made wine in hut, the police party reached there and recovered 40 liters of illicit country made liquor from the temporary hut of co-accused Ajay Rajvanshi, 50 liters of illicit country made liquor from the temporary hut of petitioner no.1 and 60 liters of illicit country made liquor from the temporary hut of petitioner no.2.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26207 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioners. Learned counsel submits that petitioners were not present at the spot and they have no concern with the alleged seized liquor. He further submits that the temporary hut from where the alleged recovery has been made were open door. Learned counsel submits that petitioner no.1 is an old man aged about 65 years having one criminal antecedent and petitioner no.2 is a women having two criminal antecedents, in which they are on bail. Petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and the nature of allegation leveled against the petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court-2, Nawada/ concerned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26207 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026 3/3 Court in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No.86 of 2026, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T