Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27164 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

MD. ABDUL @ MD. ABDUL GANI @ ABDUL GANI S/o Md. Sabdul Marhoom Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, DistrictBegusarai. 2.

Shamina Khatoon W/o Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, District-Begusarai. 3.

Md. TuffaIL S/o Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, District-Begusarai. 4.

Nargis Begum @ Nargis Khatoon D/o Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, DistrictBegusarai. 5.

Md. Sohil S/o Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, District-Begusarai. 6.

Sajda Khatoon D/o Md. Abdul @ Md. Abdul Gani @ Abdul Gani Resident of Village-Narullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioners.

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Sahzadi Khatoon W/o Md. Ful Hasan @ Babul @ Babu Resident of VillageNarullahpur, P.S.-Khodawanpur, District-Begusarai, daughter of Md. Subhan, presently residing at village Jharahi, P.S.-Chorahi (OP), DistrictBegusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhubneshwar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Saket Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27164 of 2020(4) dt.15-03-2021 2/3 406 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

All the petitioners in association of husband of the complainant are said to have mentally and physically tortured the complainant on non-fulfillment of dowry demand and lastly ousted her from the matrimonial house.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case due to family feud. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. All the petitioners are in-laws of the complainant. As a matter of fact, the husband of the complainant is working at Panchkula and the complainant also used to live with her husband. All the petitioners are separated from her husband. He also submitted that the matter was referred to the DLSA but could not be settled. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27164 of 2020(4) dt.15-03-2021 3/3 learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Complaint Case No.106 (C) of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T