Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27143/2020dismissed

Avinash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-02-24Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27143 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Avinash Kumar S/o Umakant Singh @ Rajaram Singh Resident of VillageRamdiri Tola Bhavnandpur, P.S.-Matihani, District-Begusarai. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner hereby undertakes to remove all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter as and when required. It is accordingly directed that all defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter be removed within one month hereof.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 24.05.2019, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Begusarai Muffasil (Singhaul) P.S. Case No. 253 of 2019 for the offences alleged under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26(ii)/35 of the Arms Act having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 12.12.2019 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 82270 of 2019.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with recovery of two country made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27143 of 2020(4) dt.24-02-2021 2/2 pistols and 18 cartridges. It is submitted that in any event the petitioner has already suffered more than one year and nine months in custody.

4. Learned APP appears and has been heard.

5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of the offence alleged as well as the criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of bail to the petitioner. The bail petition stands dismissed with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after framing of charge.

6. Office shall follow-up to ensure that all defects are removed and compliance with the notices of this Court are made by the petitioner within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T