Jitendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6542 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Jitendra Prasad S/o Baijnath Prasad R/o Village - Jadopur Shukul, P.S - Jadopur, District - Gopalganj.
2.
Pramod Yadav S/o Barrister Prasad Yadav R/o Village - Baluwan Sagar, P.S - Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Old Secretariat, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary Department of Personal and Administrative Reforms now known as Department of General Administration, Govt. of Bihar, Old Secretariat Patna.
4.
The director Primary Education Department of Human Resources Development, Govt. of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 5.
Director Mass Education (Jan Shiksha), Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna. 6.
The District Magistrate/ Collector Vaishali, District - Vaishali. 7.
The District Education Officer Vaishali, District - Vaishali. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Harendra Prasad, Advocate For the State :
Ms. Binita Singh, SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-11-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. This writ application has been filed for commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioners on the post of Group-D under the Adult and Non-Formal Education Plan of Government of Bihar in terms of letter dated 24.05.2021 bearing Memo No. 596 (Annexure-1 to this writ application).
3. In this case, a counter-affidavit has been filed on
Patna High Court CWJC No.6542 of 2023(2) dt.13-11-2024 2/2 behalf of the District Education Officer, Vaishali (Respondent No. 7. In Paragraph No. 9 of the said counter-affidavit it is stated that grievance of the petitioners has already been redressed and appointment letters have duly been issued in favour of the petitioner vide Memo No. 437 dated 03.07.2024 issued under the signature of the District Magistrate, Vaishali (Respondent No. 6). Copy of the said appointment letter is annexed in the counter-affidavit as Annexure-R/A.
4. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the instant writ application has been infructuous.
5. Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U