← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6553/2023disposed

Ram Chandra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-21Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6553 of 2023 ====================================================== Ram Chandra Prasad, aged about 71 years, (Male), Son of Late Janki Sah, Resident of Village- Nimoiya, Post- Nimoiya, P.S.- Ghora Sahan, DistrictEast Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, General and Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Addl. Chief Secretary Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate Motihari, East Champaran. 5.

The District Education Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 6.

The District Programme Officer (Primary Education and SSA) Motihari, East Champaran.

7.

Senior District Treasury Officer Motihari, East Champaran. 8.

The District Treasury Officer, Moihari, East Champaran 9.

The Accountant General of Bihar, Patna.

10.

Senior Accountant Officer of Bihar, Patna.

11.

Account Officer, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madanjeet Kumar, GP-20 Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, AC to GP-20 For the A.G, Bihar :

Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 21-09-2023 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; MR. Madanjeet Kumar, learned GP-20 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Vivekanand Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Accountant General, Bihar.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6553 of 2023 dt.21-09-2023 2/2 petitioner submits that petitioner had retired from the post of teacher and is worried about the entitlement of the family pension after his death. It is next submitted that petitioner has solemnized marriage with Mithlesh Devi (second wife) with the consent of the first wife namely, Mauli Devi before being appointed on the post of teacher on 12.01.1974. He further submits that the first wife of the petitioner is legally wedded wife and she should be paid family pension after the death of the petitioner.

3. The writ petition is pre-mature as the petitioner is still alive and he is getting pension.

4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) nilmani/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 04.10.2023 Transmission Date N.A