Diksha Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2111 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -691 Year- 2017 Thana -PHULWARI District- PATNA ====================================================== Diksha Kumari, Daughter of Satyendra Sharma @ Satyendra Kumar, resident of Village- New Ranipur, P.S.- Phulwarisharif, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 691 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In the written report there is allegation that this petitioner along with her mother has forcibly given poison to the daughter of the informant, on account of which, she died. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is Nanad of the deceased.
From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2111 of 2018 (4) dt.28-03-2018 2/2 prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Phulwarisharif P.S. Case No. 691 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge-XV-cum-A.C.J.M, Patna, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.
with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.