Rohit Kumar v. The Union Of India Through Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence Muzaffarpur.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35813 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2019 Thana- D.R.I District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

ROHIT KUMAR Son of Ranjit Singh Resident of Village - Nishanpur, P.S.- Telhara, District - Nalanda (Bihar) 2.

Imtaz Mandal Son of Gopal Mandal Resident of Village - Barakalija, Suryamani, P.S.- South Salmara, District - Dhubri (Assam) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Muzaffarpur. Bihar 2.

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.K.N. Singh (Adsg) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2021 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

Petitioners have earlier moved twice before this Court for grant of bail in Cr. Misc. No. 15164 of 2020 and 22891 of 2020, which were rejected vide orders dated 03.03.2020 and 04.09.2020 respectively, as contained in Annexure-1 series.

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioners are custody custody since 27.11.2019 and there is no progress in the trial.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35813 of 2021(7) dt.03-11-2021 2/2 Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected twice on merit and there is no fresh ground urged on behalf of the petitioner. Earlier, by order dated 04.08.2021 a report was called for from the court below, which has been received and kept at Flag-'A'. Perused the report.

Considering the nature of allegations levelled, the materials available on record and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Their prayer for bail is, accordingly, rejected.

However, the trial court is directed to conclude the trial of the case expeditiously preferably within six months from today.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T