← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1428/2019disposed

Rubby Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-18Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1428 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24418 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Rubby Devi W/o Pushplal Kunwar Resident of Village-Chintamanpur, P.O. Chakiyan, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 2.

Dhiraj Kumar Singh Son of Shubh Narayan Singh Resident of VillageRamkola, P.O-Kamta, P.S.-Baniyapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 3.

Ramesh Mahto Son of Late Nirgun Mahto Resident of Village-Methaura, P.O.-Dubauli, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar, aged about 59 years, male, the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

Sri R.K.Mahajan, the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Kumar Ramanuj, the Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Ajay Kumar Chaudhary, the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Sri Subrata Sen, the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra 6.

Sri Jaychand Prasad Srivastava, the District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.

7.

Sri Sunil Kumar Gupta, the District Programme Officer, (Mass Education), Saran at Chapra.

8.

Sri Lakhindra Paswan, the Block Education Officer, Panapur, District Saran at Chapra.

9.

Sri Binod Kumar Singh, the Block Education Officer, Baniyapur, District Saran at Chapra.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Smt. Shilpa Singh (Ga12) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, necessary order has

Patna High Court MJC No.1428 of 2019(5) dt.18-02-2026 2/2 been passed, which is contained in Memo No. 871 dated 03.08.2022, by which the claim of the petitioners has been redressed.

3. Counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to challenge the same.

4. Liberty is restored for taking appropriate remedy as is available in law.

5. The contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U