← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1429/2019disposed

Manoj Kumar Prasad @ Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-18Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1429 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11044 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Manoj Kumar Prasad @ Manoj Kumar Son of Malik Prasad Resident of Kondh Bhagwanpur, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 2.

Shubh Narayan Singh Son of Vijay Singh Resident of Village-Bankawa, P.O. Rasauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 3.

Dinesh Ram Son of Sheo Prasad Ram Resident of Village-Bhagwanpur, P.O. Rampur Rudra, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 4.

Shailesh Kumar Singh Son of Nag Narayan Singh Resident of VillageDhanauti, P.O.-Mashrak, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 5.

Rajesh Prasad Sah Son of Jatai Sah Resident of Village-Satjora, P.O.-Satjora, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra.

6.

Nand Kishore Prasad Son of Jailal Rout Resident of Village-Bhagwanpur, P.O. Brit Bhagwanpur, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 7.

Chhotelal Manjhi Son of Rampujan Manjhi Resident of Village-Panapur, P.O. Rasauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 8.

Parmatma Ram Son of Lakshman Ram Resident of Village-Kondh Bhagwanpur, P.O. Rampur Rudra, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 9.

Chandarma Ram Son of late Bhola Ram Resident of Village-Panapur, P.O.- Rasauli, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 10.

Krishna Ram Son of late Ganesh Ram Resident of Village-Turki, P.O. Rasauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 11.

Shatrughan Sah Son of Rampukar Sah Resident of Village-Dhanauti, P.O. Mashrak, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 12.

Vijay Kumar Rowat Son of Jadunandan Prasad Rout Resident of VillageRasauli, Bind toli, P.O. Rasauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 13.

Ranjan Kumar Son of Visheshwar Mishra Resident of Dhanauti, P.O. Mashrak, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 14.

Bindu Devi W/o Pradeep Singh Resident of Village-Semraha, P.O. belour, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra.

15.

Kameshwar Lal Yadav @ Kamlwshpur Lal Yadav Son of Barfi Yadav Resident of Village-Totha Jagatpur, P.O. Bijauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra.

16.

Jai Kishore Singh Son of Dudhnath Singh Resident of Village-Methaura, P.O.-Dubauli, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 17.

Prabhunath Kumar Son of Sakaldeo Rai Resident of Village-Bijauli-37, P.O.-Belour, P.S. Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. 18.

Md. Naim @ Md. Nayeem Son of Md. Khalil Resident of Village-Bankawa, P.o Rasauli, P.S.-Panapur, District-Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Patna High Court MJC No.1429 of 2019(5) dt.18-02-2026 2/3 1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Deepak Kumar, aged about 59 years, Male, the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Sri R.K.Mahajan, the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Kumar Ramanuj, the Director, Mass Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Ajay Kumar Choudhary the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Sri Subrat Kumar Sen the Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.

6.

Shri Suresh Bhagat the District Development Commissioner, Saran at Chapra.

7.

Sri Jaychand Prasad Srivastava, the District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.

8.

Sunil Kumar Gupta, the District Programme Officer, (Establishment), Saran at Chapra.

9.

Lakhindra Paswan, the Block Education Officer, Panapur, District Saran at Chapra.

10.

Lakhindra Paswan, the Block Education Office, Masharak, District Saran at Chapra.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey (Aag15) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 18-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that pursuant to the order passed by this Court, necessary order has been passed, which is contained in Memo No. 871 dated 03.08.2022, by which the claim of the petitioners has been rejected.

3. Counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty to challenge the same.

Patna High Court MJC No.1429 of 2019(5) dt.18-02-2026 3/3

4. Liberty is restored for taking appropriate remedy as is available in law.

5. The contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U