Narendra Kumar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.969 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22102 of 2013 ===========================================================
1. Narendra Kumar Son of Sri Surendra Sharma resident of village - Indrapur, P.S. Makhdumpur, in the of District - Jehanabad
2. Sanjeet Kumar Son of Sri Bhagwan Sharma resident of Village - Lari, P.S. Kurtha in the district of Arwal
3. Vivek Kumar Son of Sri Janardan Singh resident of Village - Punar, P.S. Atri in the district of Gaya .... .... Appellant/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. The Inspector General ( Jail ) Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna
4. The Joint Secretary - cum - Director ( Administration ), Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna
5. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna through its Secretary
6. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commissioner, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sushant Kumar Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocates For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chittranjan Sinha, Sr. Advocate Mr. Shekhar Kumar Prasad, AC to PAAG-2 For respondent Nos.5 and 6: Mr. Vipin Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 22-03-2017 Considering the fact that the learned Writ Court has rejected the petition filed by the petitioners for grant of appointment on the post of Jail Wardens on account of the criteria laid down by the Circular dated 3.6.2008 in the matter of obtaining training as a
Patna High Court LPA No.969 of 2014 dt.23-03-2017 2/2 Home guard from the State of Bihar, was not fulfilled by the 3 appellants, we see no reason to make indulgence into the matter. Once the criteria laid down in the Circular are not fulfilled by the appellants and the Circular and its constitutional validity is not challenged, the same is binding not only on the appellants, but also on this Court and no relief can be granted to the appellants violating the provisions of the Circular. Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed.
(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) K.C.jha/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 28.03.2017 Transmission Date N/A