Guddi Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29165 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2024 Thana- SUGAULI District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Guddi Devi W/o- Sheolal Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 2.

Sheolal Sah S/o- Late Hira Sah @ Heera Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 3.

Sabita Devi @ Savitri Devi W/o- Kishun Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 4.

Kishun Sah S/o- Late Hira Sah @ Heera Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 5.

Mithun Sah Son of Kishun Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 6.

Baleshwar Sah @ Baleswar Kumar S/o- Kishun Sah Ressident of villDharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 7.

Dilshan Sah @ Dilshan Kumar @ Dilsham Sah S/o- Late Bhulan Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran 8.

Manorama Devi W/o- Late Bhulan Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.sSugauli Dist-East Champaran 9.

Ramlal Sah S/o- Late Hira Sah @ Heera Sah Ressident of vill- Dharampur, P.s- Sugauli Dist-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prateek Tandon, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 427, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29165 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 2/3

3. As per prosecution case, these petitioners assaulted informant and her family members by means of lathi, danda and iron rod as a result of which five persons sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons also snatched jewellery.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to land dispute, simple altercation took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus. Injuries sustained by the injured are simple in nature. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.

6. Considering the nature of accusation, simple injury and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Sugauli P. S. Case No. 147 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29165 of 2025(2) dt.14-05-2025 3/3 Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T