← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16354/2010dismissed

Nanhku Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-03-13Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16354 of 2010 ====================================================== NANHKU CHAUDHARY S/O Late Dularchand Chaudhary R/O Vill.- Rahmatganj, P.S.- Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through Department Of Rural Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director, Department Of Rural Development, Government Of Bihar, Patna 3.

The Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 4.

The Vice-Chairman, Nagar Parishad, Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 5.

The District Magistrate, Patna 6.

The Superintendent Of Police, Gramin, Patna 7.

The Sub-Divisional Officer S.D.O., Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 8.

The Executive Magistrate, Nagar Parishad, Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 9.

The S.D.P.O. Sub-Divisional Police Officer Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 10.

That Station House Officer P.S.- Masaurhi, Distt.- Patna 11.

Shashikant Singh S/o Ram Ikbal Singh, Resident of Station Road, Kumhrar Toli, Masaurihi, Dist-Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shashi Bhushan Kumar,Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raghwanand, GA-11 Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwari,AC to GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 13-03-2023 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1.That this present application is being filed for removing the encroachment in premises of Dak Bungalow Road captured by the seller of vegetables and staying the motorbike by others in shelter of bad

Patna High Court CWJC No.16354 of 2010(5) dt.13-03-2023 2/2 elements of the society. As settlement of the said premises have been held in their names and they take bribe/market tax from the vegetable seller according to their sweet will without giving any receipts in which the public place is obstructed. The said premises have become the place of business and income without carrying the unauthorized place. And the same is continuing since 2006, despite ignoring the representations already served to the competent authorities of the State."

After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/sonalU