← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27190/2020bail granted

Manjeet Kumar Choudhary @ Manjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27190 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2020 Thana- PATORI District- Samastipur ====================================================== MANJEET KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ MANJEET KUMAR, Gender-Male, aged about 34 years, Son of Ramanand Choudhary, Resident of Village - Marai, Police Station - Jandaha in the district of Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party :

Mr. S.M. Rehman, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2021 Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Section 395 of the I.P.C.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that five unknown criminals entered in the office of L.I.C., Shahpur Patory Branch and on the fear of pistol, looted Rs. 10,71,803/-.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27190 of 2020(4) dt.05-01-2021 2/3 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2020. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner has transpired in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has been identified in the C.C.T.V. footage showing that he was standing in queue in the L.I.C. Office. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner stating therein that the petitioner had gone to L.I.C. Office in connection with a L.I.

C. Policy of his father. Hence, his presence is said to have been marked in the office of the L.I.C. Other co-accused has been granted bail by another Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. No. 19174 of 2020 under order dated 09.07.2020, annexed as Annexure-2 to the bail application.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27190 of 2020(4) dt.05-01-2021 3/3 on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Samastipur, in connection with Patori P.S. Case No. 18 of 2020. (Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T