← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6129/2014disposed

Vinod Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-20Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6129 of 2014 ====================================================== Vinod Kumar Prasad, Son of Shri Abhiram Prasad, resident of VillageBaunaganj, P.O. Jalalpur, Police Station- Daraunda, District- Siwan, at present Panchayat Teacher in Govt. Primary School, Jalalpur Mathia, Anchal Daraunda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Magistrate, Siwan.

4. The District Education Officer, Siwan.

5. The District Programme Officer, Establishment (Education), Siwan.

6. The Blcok Education Officer, Daraunda, District- Siwan.

7. The Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Raj Jalalpur, Block- Daraunda, District- Siwan.

8. The Panchayat Secretary of Gram Panchayat Raj Jalalpur, BlockDaraunda, District- Siwan.

9. The Headmaster, Govt. Primary School Jalalpur Mathia, Anchal Daraunda, District- Siwan.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate. For the State : Mr. S.C. 15. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

It has been pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in L.P.A. No. 99 of 2012 dated 22.02.2012, C.W.J.C. No. 3035 of 2009 dated 29.07.2011 and L.P.A. No. 92 of 2015 dated 18.08.2017.

Patna High Court CWJC No.6129 of 2014 (2) dt.20-11-2017 2/2 Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to make a representation enclosing the aforesaid orders passed by this Court in different cases before the respondent no. 5, the District Programme Officer, Establishment (Education), Siwan, who shall examine the claim of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order, in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of such representation taking into account the aforesaid different orders passed by this Court.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the present writ application stands disposed of.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U