Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22692/2020bail rejected

Sheojee Thakur @ Sheojee Singh @ Shivje Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2020-12-07Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22692 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-115 Year-2020 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran ====================================================== Sheojee Thakur @ Sheojee Singh @ Shivje Thakur Son of Late Jagarnath Thakur Resident of Village- Nethuwa, P.S.- Marhaurh, Distt- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jagarnath Singh, Advocate Mr.Udai Shankar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Tej Pratap Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 07-12-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant. In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Marhaura P.S. Case No.115 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/120 (B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation has been made that the son of the informant was surrounded by the petitioner and his associates and the accused persons had killed his son.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that in the FIR, he is an order giver and he is not the assailant of the deceased inasmuch as he is in judicial custody for a long period. In paragraph 3 of the bail petition, he has stated about

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22692 of 2020(6) dt.07-12-2020 2/2 his criminal history, which shows that in the year 2017, two cases of murder has been lodged again him.

Counsel for the informant submits that earlier they have tried to kill his son but anyhow he survived but later on he had been killed. There is always possibility that the moment when he will come out will finish the entire family. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. The trial court is directed to conclude the trial preferably within a period of nine months subject to cooperation extended by the parties.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T