Sutta Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48806 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -6 Year- 2014 Thana -KATRA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Sutta Sah, son of Laddu Sah

2. Raja Sah

3. Mohan Sah

4. Gopal Sah Petitioner no.2-4 are sons of Sutta Sah

5. Natuni Sah Son of Lakshmi Sah All resident of Vill- Pahsaul, P.S.- Katra, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bam Bahadur Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-12-2016 Heard Sri Bam Bahadur Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Umesh Lal Verma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.

Five petitioners, who are named accused in the F.I.R., apprehending their arrest in Katra P.S. Case No.6/14 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379/504 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that due to village politics, petitioners have been made accused. He further submits that both parties are close relative and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48806 of 2016 (2) dt.07-12-2016 2/2 they have been falsely implicated in the present case. However, after going through the material on record, it is evident that before the court below no such plea was taken, rather the court below considering the allegation as well as the injury report has rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, there is no reason to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail. The petition stands dismissed. (Rakesh Kumar, J) NKS/- U T