Patna High CourtC. REV./18/2016disposed

Manoj Kumar Singh v. The Bihar State Election Authority And ORS

2016-03-02Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

Patna High Court C. REV. No.18 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.18 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 9395 of 2015 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar Singh, son of Sheo Chand Choudhary, resident of villageTurkwalia, P.O.- Ranjan Dih, P.S.-Rajpur, Block- Nasriganj, DistrictRohtas. ....... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Bihar State Election Authority through its Secretary, 32 Harding Road, Patna-1

2. The District Magistrate cum District returning Officer, Rohtas.

3. The District Co-operative Officer, Rohtas.

4. The Block Development Officer cum Block Returning Officer, Nasriganj, Rohtas.

5. The Block Co-operative Officer cum Block Alternate Returning Officer, Nasriganj, Rohtas.

..... Respondent 1st Set- Respondent 1st Set/ Opp. Party

6. Sanjay Singh, son of Late Basudeo Choudhary, resident of VillageTurkwalia, P.O.- Ranjan Dih, P.S.- Rajpur, Block-Nasriganj, DistrictRohtas. ...... Respondent 2nd Set-Respondent 2nd Set/Opp. Party

7. Turkwalia Milk Producers Co-Operative Society Ltd. through its Secretary, Turkwalia, P.O.- Ranjan Dih, P.S.- Nasriganj, Rohtas .... .... Respondent 3rd Set- Respondent 3rd Set/ Opp. Party. ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 02-03-2016 The petitioner seeks a review of the order dated 2.11.2015 passed in CWJC No.9395 of 2015. Whereas it is the grievance of the petitioner that the election programme was not published by the State Election Authority, the counter affidavit filed on their behalf gave a clarification. It is in consideration of the stand taken by the State Election Authority that this Court did

Patna High Court C. REV. No.18 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016 not find reasons to grant indulgence to the prayer made in the writ petition and even the grounds raised herein do not persuade this Court to review the order passed by this Court on the writ petition for it merely seeks a rehearing of the matter. This review application is accordingly disposed of. (Jyoti Saran, J) deepika/- U