Kanhaiya Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11358 of 2021 ====================================================== Kanhaiya Prasad Son of Late Vishwamitra Prasad Resident of Village and Post Kaithi, P.S. Kachwa, District- Rohtas, Resident at Adhar Card VillageNeel Kothi, P.S.- Dehri, District- Rohtas (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar at Patna. 2.

District Magistrate, Rohtas (Sasaram), District- Rohtas. 3.

The Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Licensing Authority, Bikramganj, P.S.- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

Marketing Officer, Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. 5.

The District Supply Officer, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. 6.

The Assistant Supply Officer, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. 7.

The Circle Officer, Bikramganj, District- Rohtas at Sasaram. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore (Ag) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH) 07-03-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned order 13.07.2020, whereby the SubDivisional Officer-cum-Licensing Authority, Bikramganj under the provision of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 {in short '(Control) Order'} has cancelled the petitioner's license to run a PDS shop.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11358 of 2021(2) dt.07-03-2022 2/2 Considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appropriate authority. if an appeal is preferred within four weeks from today with an application seeking condonation of delay, the Appellate Authority shall be required to consider the same in accordance with law, keeping in mind the fact that petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court by filing present writ application. The Court further expects the Appellate Authority to decide petitioner's appeal as expeditiously as possible and within the period prescribed for disposal of an appeal under (Control) Order. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ( Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U