Narendra Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1155 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 2588 of 2012 =========================================================== Narendra Kumar Jha Son of Shri Vinodanand Jha, Resident of Village and P.O. Bathnaha, P.S. Forbisganj, District - Araria .... .... Appellant

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

4. The District Magistrate, Araria

5. The District Teacher's Employment Appellate Authority, Araria through its Members

6. The Member, District Teacher's Employment Appellate Authority, Araria

7. The District Superintendent of Education - cum - District Programme Officer, Araria

8. The Block Development Officer, Block - Farbisganj, District - Araria

9. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block - Farbisganj, District - Araria

10. The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj - Amauna, Block - Farbisganj, District - Araria

11. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj - Amauna, Block - Farbisganj, District - Araria

12. Amarnath Keshri Son of Sri Shatrughan Prasad Keshari Resident of Mohalla - Kothihat Chauk, Ward No.3, Farbishganj, P.S. Farbishganj, District - Araria .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant :

Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent State: Mr. Arun Kumar, AC to GP-1 For the Respondent No.12 : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Rishi Roy, Advocate Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 05-05-2017 It seems wisdom seems to have prevailed upon the appellant because the Court after going through the findings recorded

Patna High Court LPA No.1155 of 2014 dt.05-05-2017 2/2 by the learned single Judge was inclined not to interfere with the final finding given by the learned single Judge with regard to the role played by the appellant and his conduct of using forged and fabricated document coupled with suppression of facts to impose suitable cost upon him, which the learned single Judge had not done out of sheer magnanimity.

The facts being what they are, the appellant cannot be allowed to go scot-free. However, as a strategy now, the counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw the appeal and not precipitate the issue beyond a point.

Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 06.05.2017 Transmission Date N/A