Sukhdeo Sahni v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1263 of 2015 ----- (Complaint Case No.2486 of 2015, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur) ====================================================== Sukhdeo Sahni son of Manjhi Sahni, Resident of village Baluahan, P.S.- Hathauri, P.O.- Sahila Rampur, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur
4. The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur
5. The S.D.J.M. (East), Muzaffarpur
6. The S.H.O. Hathauri Police Station, Muzaffarpur
7. Shankar Sahni son of Late Chotan Sahni
8. Sanjay Sahni son of Chandeshwar Sahni
9. Lalan Sahni son of Shankar Sahni
10. Ram Kumar Sahni Son of Late Chotan Sahni
11. Uday Sahni son of Biltu Sahni, All Residents of village Baluahan, P.S. Hathauri, P.O.- Sahila Rampur, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nachiketa Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, A.C. to G.P.-21 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 11-12-2015 Heard Mr. Nachiketa Jha, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, learned Assistant Counsel to Government Pleader No.21, appearing for the respondents.
After some arguments, Mr. Nachiketa Jha, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to
Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1263 of 2015 (2) dt.11-12-2015 2/2 withdraw this application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and also to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U T