Rajeev Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.35041 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2020 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== Rajeev Singh @ Rajeev Kumar Singh Son of Ram Prasidh Singh Resident of Village- Gawandri, P.S.- Taraiya, District- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2.

09-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner seeks bail in Taraiya P.S. Case No. 374 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

70 liters of country-made liquor (spirit) has been recovered from the Khajurbani, situated in front of the house of the petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered either from the conscious possession of the petitioner or from the house of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.35041 of 2021(2) dt.09-09-2021 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as nature of allegation, the bail petition of petitioner is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Saran in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 374 of 2020, on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court below and shall remain physically present, as directed by the court below, and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail."

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T