Amrendra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29737 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== JAIPRAKASH KUMAR YADAV @ JAI PRAKASH KUMAR YADAV Son of Prabhu Rai Resident of Village - Bhopatpur Chaubey Tola, P.S.- Kotwa, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

A.D.G.P., Vigilance Dept., Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rahul Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajay Mishra, APP For the Vigilance :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate Mr. Paritosh Parimal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case no.322 of 2024 registered under sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation in the F.I.R is that the petitioner was appointed as a Block Teacher on the basis of false and fabricated document.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed in the year 2015 and has worked till 16.06.2025 with an unblemished record and without any notice the action has been taken against him. Further, a supplementary

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29737 of 2025(4) dt.17-07-2025 2/2 affidavit has been filed by the petitioner stating therein that petitioner now stands terminated vide letter dated 16.06.2025. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and undertakes to cooperate in the case/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the Vigilance on the ground that petitioner did not resign during the amnesty period.

6. Taking into consideration the fact that petitioner is now terminated, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case no.322 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) Harsh/- U T