Sujeet Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27435 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2017 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani ====================================================== SUJEET KUMAR YADAV Son of Narendra Narayan Yadav @ Narendra Yadav Resident of Village- Modhiya, P.S.- Basopatti, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Deodha P.S. Case No. 92/2017, instituted for offence under Section(s) 290/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 37(B) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It is alleged in the written report that one country made pistol and three live cartridges have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

Petitioner is in custody since 23.09.2019.

Keeping in view the period of custody already spent by the petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27435 of 2019(2) dt.26-04-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge, Excise Act, Madhubani, in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 92/2017, subject to the conditions that (I) both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and (III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) rakhi/- U T