Mona Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25986 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2018 Thana- KHAJANCHI HAT District- Purnia ====================================================== 1.
MONA PASWAN S/o Late Singheshwar Paswan R/o Mohalla- Korathbari, P.S.- K. Hat, District- Purnea 2.
Soni Devi W/o Sri Ranjeet Paswan R/o Mohalla- Korathbari, P.S.- K. Hat, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar Anand For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 148. 149, 341, 342, 323, 379, 427,504, 506 and 448 IPC registered in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case No. 337 of 2018.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of land dispute and there is case and counter case between the parties. The FIR has been instituted only because the informant wants possession of the petitioners' and which has been purchased through registered sale deed by the grand mother-in-law of the petitioner no. 2. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Purnea, in connection with K. Hat (Madhubani) P.S. Case
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25986 of 2019(2) dt.22-04-2019 2/2 No. 337 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. and also subject to the following further conditions: i. That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioners. ii. That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
iii. That the petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iv. The petitioner no. 1 shall remain physically present and petitioner no. 2 shall be well represented in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/- U T