Hamid Ansari @ Abdul Hamid Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26633 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-16 Year-2021 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.
HAMID ANSARI @ ABDUL HAMID ANSARI SON OF LATE BIRAHIM ANSARI R/O- VILL- POSTMARA, P.S.- CHAKAI, DISTRICT- JAMUI 2.
RAZIYA KHATOON WIFE OF HAMID ANSARI @ ABDUL HAMID ANSARI R/O- VILL- POSTMARA, P.S.- CHAKAI, DISTRICT- JAMUI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application against petitioner no. 1. Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner no. 1.
So far as petitioner no. 2 is concerned, the instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner no. 2 apprehending her arrest in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 16 of 2021 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
This case relates to torture and harassment due to nonfulfillment of further dowry demand by the petitioner along with her family members and ultimately they killed the informant's daughter.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26633 of 2022(3) dt.10-11-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is mother-in-law of the deceased. She has never demanded any thing from the deceased. She has no concern with the daily activity of the deceased and her husband. She is living separately. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that husband and father-in-law of the deceased had already been granted bail.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is inclined to enlarge her on bail. The petitioner no. 2 is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of her arrest or surrender in connection withChakai P.S. Case No. 16 of 2021 he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Jamui subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U