Md. Muslim v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.927 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-993 Year-2017 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia ====================================================== Md. Muslim S/o late Hazi Abdul Aziz, resident of Village-Mahesh Bathana, P.S.- Baisi, District-Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Dharma Singh, Manager, R.S. Infra Project Private Limited, Kishanganj

3. Shantanu, Junior Engineer, Electricity B.S. P.T.C., Kishanganj

4. Laxaman, Junior Engineer, Electricity B.S.P.T.C., Kishanganj All resident of Mohallah- P.S.- Kishanganj, District- Kishanganj

5. Tarkeshwar Prasad Singh, the Officer-in-charge Baisi Police Station, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea

6. Sadanand Singh, the Sub-Inspector Baisi Police Station, P.S.- Baisi, District- Purnea

7. Md. Sabbir Khan, the Assistant Sub-Inspector Baisi Police Station, P.S.- Baisi, District-Purnea ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sri Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 28-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present criminal revision application has been filed against order dated 11.07.2017 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in Complaint Case No. 993 of 2017 by which the complaint petition of the petitioner was rejected.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a poor person and his house was demolished by the opposite

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.927 of 2017(2) dt.28-04-2023 2/2 parties in the name of installation of electric pole and tower on his raity land without payment of any compensation to him. Counsel for the State submits that if petitioner has any grievances against the electricity department, he ought to file representation to the officials and if he requires compensation, he ought to move before the highest authorities. In this background, this criminal revision application is hereby dismissed granting liberty to the petitioner that he may raise his claim before the appropriate authorities for the same and shall also grant compensation from them.

With the aforesaid observation, the present criminal revision application is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) ravishankar/- U T