← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29663/2025bail granted

Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-11Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29663 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2024 Thana- KURSAILA District- Katihar ====================================================== Sudhir Kumar @ Sudhir Yadav Son of Narayan Yadav Resident of villageKheria Yadav Tola P.S -Kursela, Dist- Katihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Suresh Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 140(1) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, informant suspects that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, kidnapped her son and killed him.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness of the alleged occurrence and only suspicion has been raised against this petitioner. Moreover, the present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 25 days and there is no plausible

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29663 of 2025(4) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 explanation for the same. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent in which he is already on bail.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation and delay in lodging of the F.I.R., the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Kursela P.S. Case No. 211 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T