← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26745/2023bail rejected

Raj Kumari @ Raj Kumari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-10Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26745 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-471 Year-2022 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== RAJ KUMARI @ RAJ KUMARI DEVI SON OF SACHIN PASWAN@ SACHHU PASWAN VILLAGE- MADHURAPUR KUSHDEY, MADHURAPUR, P.O. LALGANJ P.S. LALGANJ DISTRICT VAISHALI 844121 BIHAR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Neeraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Ballabh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 409, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. This petitioner, in collusion with other accused person, misappropriated huge amount of government money under the 'Nal Jal Yojna'.

4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner had earlier approached District Magistrate- Hajipur, Vaishali and raised her serious objection regarding the irregularities happening in the ward no. 7 and informed the District Magistrate regarding misappropriation of government aid by Mukhiya & Panchayat Secretary and only thereafter, the present FIR was lodged.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26745 of 2023(3) dt.10-08-2023 2/2

5. However, learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that petitioner was president of WIMC Committee and entire government money was transferred in the account of this petitioner and said amount has been disbursed, but no work was done under the said scheme.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay/- U T