← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20772/2013dismissed

Rajeev Kumar Rai And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2023-01-24Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20772 of 2013 ====================================================== 1.

Rajeev Kumar Rai and Ors S/O Shri Ram Sagar Rai Resident Of VillageNaya Tola Rahimpur, P.O- Rahimpur, P.S- Khagaria Mufassil DistrictKhagaria. 2.

Doman Rai S/O Late Bhumi Rai Resident Of Village- Naya Tola Rahimpur, P.O- Rahimpur, P.S- Khagaria Mufassil, District- Khagaria. 3.

Niraj Kumar S/O Late Om Prakash Chaudhary Resident Of Village P.ORahimpur, Tola- Sonebarsa, P.S- Khagaria Mufassil, District- Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.

The Director General- Cum- Inspector General Of Police, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Commandant Bmp- 5, Patna.

4.

The Commandant Bmp- 14, Patna.

5.

The Commandant Bmp- 8, Begusarai.

6.

The Senior Superintendent Of Police, Patna.

7.

The Superintendent Of Police, Khagaria.

8.

The Superintendent Of Police, Begusarai.

9.

The Superintendent Of Police, Naugachhia 10.

The Superintendent Of Police, Saharsa.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Madhu Prasun, Adv. With Mr. Aditya Singh, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Jha, AC to SC-28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2023

1. Heard the parties.

2. The matter relates to the selection conducted under the advertisement of 2004 for the post of Constable. The petitioner claims right of appointments against the left over

Patna High Court CWJC No.20772 of 2013(2) dt.24-01-2023 2/2 vacancy under the said advertisement.

3. After almost 18 years no such relief can be granted to the petitioners as selection process can not be continued for such a long period. The writ petition by efflux of time has become infructuous.

4. This writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Pravinkumar/- Item No. 27 U