Ram Ekbal Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.36371 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -337 Year- 2017 Thana -KATIHAR District- KATIHAR ======================================================

1. Ram Ekbal Sah, son of Late Bilgu Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Hawai Adda, P.S.- Katihar (Sahayak), District- Katihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Katihar Nagar (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 337 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 354 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of assault to the informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that only false and concocted case has been lodged by the informant and dispute arose with regard to passage and though it is alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant by means of Dabiya, however, the injuries caused to the informant from the said assault was found to be simple in nature. Further there is case and counter case as well.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Katihar, in connection with Katihar Nagar (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 337 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, this is further subject to the condition that:

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the

prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T