Sintu Hembram And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24190 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDMUNDI District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Sintu Hembram, S/o Late Safal Hembram,
2. Rohit Hembram S/o Hublal Hembram, Both are R/o Vill.- Benpokhra, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui.
3. Sukhdeo Soren S/o Chunnu Soren, R/o Vill.- Genuwadih, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui.
4. Sunil Hembram S/o Masi Hembram,
5. Sanjay Hembram son of Masi Hembram Both are R/o Vill.- Banpokhra, P.S.- Chandramandih, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sunil Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandramandih P.S.Cae No.94 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 153A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is that they were forcibly trying to make Christian festival and there is allegation against one Binod Murmu also that he exploded bomb.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been attributed against them. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24190 of 2018 (2) dt.03-05-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above , let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM, Jamui in connection with Chandramandih P.S.Case 94 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make themselves available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bond. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T