← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/11351/2021disposed

Manoj Kumar v. The Punjab National Bank

2024-04-24Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11351 of 2021 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar son of Vibhishan Ram resident of Village- Sursand, P.S. Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Punjab National Bank being represented through General Manager, Human Resource Management Department, Head Office, New Delhi. 2.

The Chief Manager, Human Resource Department, Inter- Zonal Office, Patna, Bihar.

3.

The Circle Head, Human Resource Division, Circle Office, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

4.

The Deputy Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Human Resource Department, Circle Office, Aghoria Bazar, Muzaffarpur, Bihar. 5.

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Sursand, Sitamarhi, Bihar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Kumar Priya Ranjan, Adv.

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Adv.

Mr.Ram Ganesh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 24-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That the petitioner through the present application has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) for grant of the following reliefs:- i. For issuance of writ of Certiorari to set aside the Final District wise Merit List published by the Circle office, Muzaffarpur dated 11.04.2018 as against the advertisement dated 30.08.2017 for

Patna High Court CWJC No.11351 of 2021(3) dt.24-04-2024 2/2 recruitment of Permanent Part Time/ Full Time Sweeper, as being in teeth of para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite Settlement on account of rejection of candidature of the petitioner without giving him any preference for his past service.

ii. For issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent bank to include the name of the petitioner in the select list by publishing a revised merit list in strict adherence of the mandated contained in para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite settlement.

iii. For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities not to give effect to the final merit list published on 11.04.2018 at least to the extent it is in breach of para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite settlement."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

3. The writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U